Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works NATURE.COM http://www.nature.com/news/ NATUREJOBS NATUREEVENTS ABOUT NPG
help Help site index Nature.com site index  
news at nature.com - the best in science journalism
USERNAME: PASSWORD:
SEARCH  Advanced search
my account e-alerts subscribe register
Home
News
Features
Columns & blogs
 Archive Archive
Specials
In focus
Stories by subject

NEWS CHANNELS
My news
Biotechnology
Careers
Drug discovery
Earth and environment
Medical Research
Physical Sciences


naturejobs

Feedback
About this site
About us
For librarians
Closing the window keeps volcanoes at bay
06 June 2005

Dolphin mothers pass tool use to daughters
06 June 2005

US mental survey depresses experts
06 June 2005

Success in primates sparks hope for Marburg vaccine
05 June 2005

Gene therapy salves sensitive nerves
03 June 2005

Martian methane could come from rocks
02 June 2005

Cave bear DNA laid bare
02 June 2005

NPG PROMOTION

News
Published online: 2 June 2005; | doi:10.1038/news050531-7

Cave bear DNA laid bare

Roxanne Khamsi
Sequencing technique could also work for Neanderthals.


Decoding ancient DNA is tricky thanks to decay and contamination.

© Getty
The degraded DNA of ancient cave bears has been sequenced, despite the fact that many considered the genetic information unrecoverable. The achievement leads researchers to think they might be able to perform the same trick with DNA from ancient human relatives, such as the Neanderthals.

In the past, scientists have managed to retrieve genetic material for analysis from animals or humans that died in icy or desert environments, because these allow for good preservation. But the remains of animals and humans are mostly found in caves, and are heavily decomposed. The DNA from such specimens is usually mixed up with DNA from soil microbes and later cave inhabitants, making it difficult to sequence.

The standard practice for sequencing genes involves making numerous copies of the initial sample through a process called a polymerase chain reaction, or PCR. Subjecting ancient DNA to this does not produce good results because PCR picks up and duplicates the sequences of modern animals more efficiently. This means that bits of contaminating DNA often drown out samples from the prehistoric animal.

"The prevailing idea was that this was impossible," says James Noonan of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California, who is lead author of the paper that appears in Science this week1.

Keeping it simple

To overcome this challenge, Noonan and his colleagues decided to skip the replicating step and directly sequence the tiny amount of DNA extracted from two Austrian cave-bear bones that are more than 40,000 years old. To make sure each portion of DNA was really from the bears rather than a contaminating source, they compared each sequence produced with the genome of the dog, a modern relative of the bear.

The technologies needed to examine such tiny amounts of DNA directly, along with the reference genome from the dog, have become available to scientists only recently.

The team determined that nearly 6% of the sequences analysed from one of their animal samples belonged to ancient bear: an unexpectedly large amount. The rest of the DNA probably came from soil microbes or the palaeontologists handling the bones, the team says.

ADVERTISEMENT
"I think that this really is a convincing proof of the approach," says geneticist Edward Rubin, also of the Lawrence Berkeley lab, who oversaw the investigation. He says the same technique should work on Neanderthal samples of about the same age or younger.


But challenges remain. Most important, it will be much harder to weed out contaminating DNA from the people who excavated the Neanderthal samples, as both sets of DNA will come from humans. "This is a problem," admits Noonan.

There were no such worries for the published study. "We have a strict policy of not employing bears at our sequencing facility," jokes Rubin.

 Top
References
  1. Noonan J. P., et al. Science, Published online: doi:10.1126/science.1113485 (2005). | Article |
 Top
For full access to the site and the archive, subscribe here:
To receive all the daily news in your inbox each week, sign up for our email alert here:
  To see the latest news visit our homepage:

 Top
Send to a friend
Printer format
e-alerts
Recommend to your library
live newsfeeds
relateds
Large genomic differences explain our little quirks 
18 May 2005

Test your own DNA 
18 March 2005
linkout
DNA anniversary special

linkout
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Cave bears

ADVERTISEMENT
Cosmic "Magnifying Glass" Reveals Distant Planet

Protein Deficiency Seen in Neurons Born in Adulthood and Those Affected by Disease

Mars Spacecraft Snaps Shots of Other Orbiting Satellites

RNA to the Rescue

more
 

news at nature

ISSN: 1744-7933
Home | News | Features | Columns and blogs | Archive news | Specials | In focus | Stories by subject |
My news | Biotechnology news | Careers news | Drug discovery news | Earth and environment news | Medical Research news | Physical sciences news |
Feedback | About this site | About us | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works ©2005 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy